![]() He considered a hypothetical situation where an owner sought approval to keep a gold fish, and stated: In this case, decided in June 2008, the member of CCT considered whether a by-law that set an absolute ban on all animals was reasonable. In one application, the adjudicator’s order (which supported the no pet by-law) was appealed at the Queensland Commercial and Consumer Tribunal (CCT) (now known as the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal-QCAT). Since the introduction of section 180(7) of the BCCM Act in 2008 by-laws that have prohibited pets have been consistently ruled as oppressive and unreasonable. ![]() The complete ban on keeping animals in a community titles schemes has been the subject of numerous dispute resolution applications lodged with us. You may wish to search for orders that deal with the different types of animal by-laws outlined above, and body corporate decisions about the keeping of animals, to help you with your own situation. There are also a number of adjudicators’ decisions that deal with the validity of by-laws prohibiting certain animals or imposing weight limits on animals.Īdjudicators’ orders are published on Australian Legal Information Institute. overturning committee decisions on animal approvals. ![]() When helping to resolve disputes, adjudicators make orders on a variety of issues relating to animals. If you have a disability under the Guide, Hearing and Assistance Dogs Act 2009 and rely on your animal, you do not need to ask permission before bringing a dog into a body corporate property.įind out more about where you can take your guide dog.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |